The Electoral Commission (EC) is facing criticism for failing to issue media accreditation to a significant number of journalists ahead of the Special Voting exercise today. Reports indicate that over three-quarters of media practitioners have not received their accreditation, sparking questions about the transparency of the process and the EC’s commitment to ensuring free and fair elections.
Many journalists are questioning whether this is a deliberate attempt by the EC to limit media coverage of the Special Voting process. Concerns are also being raised about the perceived inaction of media bodies such as the Ghana Journalists Association (GJA), Private Newspaper and Online Publishers Association of Ghana (PRINPAG), and the Ghana Independent Broadcasters Association (GIBA). Critics argue that these organizations have not exerted sufficient pressure on the EC to ensure that accreditation was issued promptly.
“Why didn’t the EC issue all accreditations before the Special Voting began? Is there something they are hiding from the media?” one journalist asked, reflecting the frustration of many media practitioners.
The EC has reportedly claimed to have issued over 4,000 ID cards to the GJA, though this falls short of the over 6,000 names submitted. Journalists who have yet to receive their accreditation are worried about how they will cover the voting process today, with some expressing concern about being sidelined during this crucial election period.
Media practitioners are calling on the EC to recognize the media as critical partners in ensuring transparency and accountability in elections. They also urge media associations to demand urgent reforms to prevent similar issues in future electoral exercises.
The delay in accreditation has left many questioning the EC’s readiness for the elections and its commitment to transparency. It is now up to the media bodies and the EC to address these issues swiftly to restore confidence in the process.
