HomeBusinessHigh Court Orders Houses of Chiefs: EXPUNGE OKOGYEMAN AWUAHAA II NAME AS...

High Court Orders Houses of Chiefs: EXPUNGE OKOGYEMAN AWUAHAA II NAME AS CHIEF OF GOMOA EKWAMKROM …And Reinstate Nana Kobina Ekwam 

Date:

Related stories

Local Government Minister Commends DRIP Team for Progress at IRECOP Waste Evacuation Site

  The Minister for Local Government, Chieftaincy and Religious Affairs,...

Hon. Mahama Ayariga hands over 20 waste collection tricycles on behalf of the AMA

  The Minister for Local Government, Chieftaincy and Religious Affairs,...

Local Government Ministry directs assemblies to verify billboard permits nationwide

  The Ministry of Local Government, Chieftaincy and Religious Affairs...

Hon. Ayariga hands over Honda motorcycles to boost Aayalolo contra-flow ahead of Christmas

  Efforts to ease rush-hour congestion in Greater Accra have...

BEYOND EARLY DETECTION: WHAT HAPPENS AFTER A BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS? 

  Breast cancer awareness must go beyond pink ribbons, screening campaigns and calls for early detection. Ghana must also confront whether its health system is adequately prepared to care for those who receive a diagnosis. Every October, pink ribbons, awareness campaigns and screening activities remind us of the importance of early detection in the fight against breast cancer. Across workplaces, churches, communities and health facilities, women are encouraged to examine their breasts, attend screening programmes and seek medical attention when they notice unusual changes. These messages are important. Early detection can improve treatment outcomes and save lives. But after losing someone I cared deeply about to breast cancer, I have found myself reflecting on a question that deserves equal attention: What happens after early detection? Let me call her Abena. Abena was a woman in her late thirties, a working professional who had spent more than a decade advocating for breast cancer awareness. She organised screening activities within her church and workplace and encouraged other women to take their breast health seriously. She understood the importance of early detection and actively promoted it. In August 2023, she discovered a lump in her armpit. An initial ultrasound examination reportedly indicated that the finding was benign. However, the swelling persisted, and a month later she noticed changes in her left breast. Further investigations, including biopsy, eventually confirmed breast cancer in November 2023. What followed was a difficult journey through the healthcare system. The physician who requested the investigations had travelled outside the country by the time the results became available. Abena was asked to wait until the physician returned before a referral could be made to the next level of care. Eventually, a colleague facilitated the referral. At the oncology unit, she was informed that the workload was high and that an arrangement described to her as "intramural" payment could secure an earlier appointment. Without this payment, her first appointment would have been in February 2024. She paid and was seen that same day. Subsequent review visits also involved additional payments.   The financial demands did not end with securing appointments. Each chemotherapy session cost approximately GH¢2,000, while a supportive injection administered after each session cost about GH¢900 at the time. The medication was provided for administration by health workers at a nearby facility. Abena completed eight cycles of chemotherapy and was preparing for a total mastectomy. Throughout this period, her health deteriorated. She experienced significant complications, including loss of sight and speech, and eventually died in June 2024. Yet, even while battling the illness, she managed to complete her Master of Laws programme. Her determination to keep going remains one of the things I remember most about her. I share Abena's story not to suggest that every aspect of her care was inappropriate or that one experience represents the entire health system. Neither can I establish that the challenges she encountered alone determined the outcome of her illness. However, her experience raises difficult questions about access, affordability, referral coordination and the support available to patients navigating serious illnesses in Ghana. A diagnosis should mark the beginning of a coordinated response, not the beginning of another struggle to find care. BEYOND AWARENESS: EXAMINING THE HEALTH SYSTEM  Early detection is only one part of the cancer care pathway. Following a suspicious finding, patients need timely diagnostic investigations, clear communication of results, appropriate referral, specialist consultation, treatment and continuous follow-up. These services must work together. Delays at any point can create additional anxiety, financial pressure and uncertainty for patients. This is particularly important when viewed against Ghana's commitment to achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) by 2030. The Sustainable Development Goals, especially SDG 3, call on countries to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all ages. Target 3.8 specifically commits countries to universal health coverage, including access to quality essential healthcare services, affordable medicines and financial risk protection. These commitments must translate into meaningful experiences for people who seek care. Universal health coverage cannot be measured simply by the number of people who enter a health facility or the availability of screening services. It must also be reflected in whether patients receive the right diagnosis at the right time, whether referrals lead to actual access to care, whether treatment is affordable and whether continuity of care is assured. The question is not only whether we can detect diseases early, but whether our health system is prepared to respond effectively when we do. Patient navigation is one area that deserves greater attention in strengthening cancer care. Nurse navigators play an important role in helping patients move through what can be a complex and overwhelming healthcare pathway. They support coordination of appointments and referrals, facilitate communication between patients and healthcare providers, help identify financial and psychosocial barriers and promote continuity throughout treatment. Ghana has made efforts to introduce and strengthen patient navigation services. However, we must look beyond the existence of individual initiatives and ask questions about their reach and sustainability. How many breast cancer nurse navigators are available across the country? How many have undergone structured, competency-based training in patient navigation? Are these services accessible to patients outside the major tertiary hospitals? Do we have adequate systems for their deployment, supervision and continued professional development? A patient navigator should not merely direct a patient from one department to another. The role requires the knowledge and skills to coordinate care, anticipate barriers and help ensure that patients are not lost along the treatment pathway. Strengthening this service should therefore form part of our broader investment in cancer care. The challenges highlighted by Abena's experience are also not exclusive to cancer. Patients living with hypertension, diabetes, stroke, kidney disease and other chronic conditions face similar needs for timely diagnosis, appropriate referral, affordable medicines, regular monitoring and continuity of care. As the burden of non-communicable diseases continues to increase, the demands on our health system will become even greater. This is therefore a broader health-system concern. We need to examine how effectively our services are organised to support patients from the point of first contact through diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation and follow-up. The ability to provide continuous, coordinated and person-centered care must become a central measure of the quality of our healthcare delivery. TURNING POLICY COMMITMENTS INTO PATIENT EXPERIENCES  Ghana's Free Primary Healthcare initiative presents an opportunity to strengthen access to essential services, improve early identification of health conditions and reduce barriers at the primary healthcare level. Similarly, the Ghana Medical Trust Fund offers an opportunity to address some of the financial challenges associated with serious and chronic illnesses. These are important interventions, but their impact will depend on how effectively they connect with the wider health system. Expanding access to primary healthcare must be accompanied by adequate diagnostic capacity, functional referral systems, specialist services, essential medicines and a health workforce equipped to provide quality care. Financial support must also translate into access to the actual services patients need and when they need them. We must be careful not to create a situation where patients are encouraged to seek early care but encounter delays, prohibitive costs or limited treatment options once a serious diagnosis is confirmed. Access to healthcare should not end at the point of screening or diagnosis. It must extend throughout the patient's journey. This also calls for deliberate investment in the health workforce. Nurses and midwives are central to patient education, early identification, care coordination, treatment support and follow-up. Their capacity must be strengthened through appropriate training, adequate staffing, supportive working environments and the resources required to deliver quality care. Patient navigation, for instance, should not depend solely on isolated projects or the commitment of a few individuals. It should be deliberately integrated into the organisation of cancer services. BEYOND OCTOBER: A CALL FOR NATIONAL REFLECTION  Breast cancer awareness should not end when October ends. Screening campaigns and public education remain essential, but they must be matched by a health system that can respond to the needs of those who receive a diagnosis. Abena's story is a reminder that behind every diagnosis is a mother, a family and a future that may depend on how effectively the health system responds. It is also a reminder that the success of our health policies should ultimately be judged by the experiences and outcomes of the people they are intended to serve. As a country working towards UHC by 2030, we must move beyond counting the number of people screened, educated or reached through awareness campaigns. We must also ask whether those who need further investigations can access them promptly, whether referrals are completed, whether treatment is affordable and whether patients receive the support required to complete their care. This reflection is in honour of Abena and the souls our health system might have failed. Their stories should challenge us to look beyond awareness and confront the gaps that patients encounter when they need care the most. Early detection is important. But what happens afterwards is equally important. And so, beyond the pink ribbons, the screening campaigns and the annual calls for early detection, I leave us with one question: WHAT'S NEXT AFTER EARLY DETECTION?  I hope this question will spark a much-needed national conversation among policymakers, healthcare professionals, health institutions, civil society, communities and every Ghanaian who depends on the health system. We must collectively examine whether our healthcare delivery system is adequately prepared not only to detect illnesses, but also to provide timely, affordable, quality and continuous care to those who need it. Maame Akosua Serwaa Gyening Email: masagg30@gmail.com  

 

The matter of who is the rightful Chief of Gomoa Ekwankrom in the Gomoa Ajumako Traditional Area has been brought to a close following a Cape Coast High Court order that the name of Nana Dr. Okogyeman Awuahaa II should be expunged from all Houses of Chief registers.

The High Court Order dated July 31, 2026, directed the Houses of Chiefs, Gomoa Ajumako Traditional Council, Central Regional House of Chiefs and the National House of Chiefs to reinstate the name of Nana Kobina Ekwam X, known in private life as Mr. Gabriel Jerom Ocran, as the Chief of Ekwankrom.

The High Court ordered the Ajumako Traditional Council to act within seven (7) days of the order and take the necessary statutory steps within thirty (30) days of the order for the registration of Nana Kobina Ekwam X as Chief of Ekwankrom.

The order came as a result of the enforcement of the judgments, especially that of the Gomoa Ajumako Traditional Council.

The Aboradze Royal Family of Gomoa Ekwamkrom is composed of three Gates, namely, the Ekwam Gate, Kwaagyaa Gate, and Awuahaa Gate. In the year 2017, I was installed as chief of Gomoa Ekwamkrom as Nana Kobina Ekwam X from the Ekwam Gate after the demise of his uncle, Nana Kweku Ekwam IX

 

Dissatisfied with the other two sections, one opanyin, Ewudzie Coleman, filed a suit before the Judicial Committee of the Gomoa Ajumako Traditional Council seeking, among other reliefs, a declaration that, since time immemorial, the ascendancy to the Odzikro Stool of Ekwamkrom was by rotation among the three Gates. After a laborious litigation, the Judicial Committee of the Traditional Council determined that ascendancy to the Odzikro Stool of Ekwamkrom is not by rotation.

It was also determined that the Ekwam Gate of the Royal Family is the sole owner of the Stool and that Ebusuapanyin Kojo Acquah is the overall Ebusuapanyin of the Aboradze Royal Family.

 

After the ruling from the Traditional Council, the plaintiff and his Gate or supporters, including Dr. Edmund Ekow Kaitoo, neglected or refused to appeal against the judgment. They filed an application for certiorari, like judicial review, at the Agona Swedru High Court in an attempt to quash the decision of the judicial committee of Gomoa Ajumako Traditional Council. The High Court, presided over by Her Ladyship Janet Annima Marfo J., flatly dismissed the certiorari application as unmeritorious.

 

Thereafter, Dr. Kaitoo caused himself to be installed as chief by people who were not members of the Royal Family under the name Nana Dr. Okogyeman Awuahaa without the consent, concurrence, or approval by the Ebusuapanyin and the principal members of the Ekwam Gate. The Omanhen of Gomoa Ajumako, under the mistaken belief that the Ekwam Gate (owners of the Stool) had granted so, accepted the installation under the guise that Nana Ekwam X had abdicated.

 

After the Omanhen’s attention was drawn to the fact that the Royal family had not installed Awuahaa II in an arbitration proceeding and that he was not occupying the Odzikro Stool, the Omanhen and Nananom ordered that Awuahaa II should avail himself for Ebusuapanyin Kojo Acquah to perform the requisite customary rites to occasion a valid abdication of the former and proper installation rituals for the purportedly installed Dr. Kaitoo to occupy the Odzikro Stool within two weeks. Otherwise, he is not deemed customarily installed.

Dr. Kaitoo refused to make himself available for the performance of the requisite customary rites on the said date, with a reason that he would die when he sat on the stool.

To drive home the fact that he is not a chief, Dr. Kaitoo requested that he should be allowed to procure a new stool for his enstoolment. The Ebusuapanyin and the principal elders, including Nana Kobina Ekwam X, filed a petition before the arbitration committee of the Central Regional House of Chiefs to investigate and determine whether or not a valid abdication had occurred and whether Dr. Edmund Kaitoo’s installation was valid.

Parties including Dr. Kaitoo executed a consent form for the matter to be settled by arbitration. The arbitration committee of the Central Regional House of Chiefs after going into the matter cited the judgment of the traditional council and that od the high court and determined that, one Emmanuel Griffin who posed himself as the Ebusuapanyin of the family and accepted the installation of Dr. Edmund Kaitoo was actually not the ebusuapanyin of the Aboradze Royal Family and does not hail from the Ekwam Gate. Therefore, his acceptance of the alleged resignation of Nana Ekwam X and installation of Dr. Kaitoo was null and void. The Central Regional House recommended that Dr. Kaitoo’s name (Nana Dr. Awuahaa II) should be expunged from the National Register of Chiefs and reinstate the name of Nana Kobina Ekwam X.

 

Upon enforcement of the judgment of the Judicial Committee of Gomoa Ajumako Traditional Council, The High Court, Cape Coast, ordered the Gomoa Ajumako Traditional Council, the Central Regional House of Chiefs and the National House of Chiefs on the 31st of July 2026 to take statutory steps to expunge the name Nana Dr. Awuahaa II from the National Register of Chiefs as Chief of Gomoa Ekwamkrom within 7 and 30 days and re-register Nana Kobina Ekwam X as chief of Gomoa Ekwamkrom.

Latest stories